It’s kind of funny that all Republicans were rejected here and all Republicans were rejected in Pittsburgh, and it amounts to about, gee, just about the 700,000 votes that President Trump was ahead by two days ago that disappeared. As a friend of mine says, I don’t believe in conspiracies, but I also don’t believe in coincidences. Now, you’re also going to find that way across on the other side of the state, there was a similar situation in Pittsburgh, involving 300,000 ballots that were un-inspected, un-reviewed, not observed by a single Republican. We can’t say that, because we never got to see it. From very far away, they look like the same pen, possibly the same handwriting. Some of the ballots you will see looked suspicious. Here, which is a much more insecure method of voting, no Republican got a chance to look at that ballot. That’s what’s done for absentee ballots, which have the extra security of having signatures you can match. If nobody objects, you put it in the pile. You take out the absentee ballot, you open it up, the Republican looks at it, the Democrat looks at it. I mean, this is common knowledge, common practice in the examination of absentee ballots, which happens all the time. If you have nothing to hide with these mail-in ballots, you allow inspection. Even when a court order was obtained to allow the Republican inspectors to get six feet closer, they moved the people counting the ballots six further feet away. What I’m saying to you is, not a single one was inspected as the law required. Those mail-in ballots could have been written the day before by the Democratic Party hacks that were all over the Convention Center. Those mail-in ballots could have been for anybody they wrote in. Those mail-in ballots could have been from anybody. Instead, in the wisdom of the Democrat officials here in a city that’s been Democrat for 60 years and has a very long history of voter fraud, documented history of voter fraud, instead of going to a high degree of care to allow inspections of the mail-in ballots, there was no inspection of a single mail-in ballot. With all that, you would have expected there’d be a high degree of security and a high degree of inspection that would be provided for mail-in ballots. Congresswoman Jordan, in her vast and compendious review of various forms of voter fraud cited mail-in ballots as the most prone to fraud. The New York Times had written that 10 years ago under other circumstances, but of course changed their mind once it was a situation involving President Trump. The people you see behind me are just a few of about, I’d say 50 to 60 poll watchers, who will all testify that were uniformly deprived of their right to inspect any single part of the mail-in ballots.Īs you know from the very beginning, the mail-in ballots were a source of some degree of skepticism, if not a lot of skepticism, as being innately prone to fraud. And these lawsuits will be brought starting on Monday.īut the first time it was discovered was here in Pennsylvania, just a couple of days ago. So, I’m here on behalf of the Trump Campaign, as an attorney for the President, to describe to you the first part of a situation that is extremely troubling, first of all for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and then for a number of other states.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |